
So I’m currently pulling apart an old Franzen novel for a project I’m working on, and it’s kind of breathtaking how well it’s holding up to the most brutal of analysis. Even when it’s beaten down to verbs, nouns and adjectives it reads like water out of a tap. It is almost enough to make me want to never write again.
But then I read this article in the Paris Review about his life work. And it turns out that it’s not easy trying to write like Jonathon Franzen, even if you are Jonathon Franzen. I can’t decide whether this makes me feel better or worse.
Either way, it’s an amazing read. Definitely worth the cover price. I especially like his discussion about his relationships and how they affected his writing.
I started writing Pynchonian letters to my then-fiancee, and I think it’s significant that she hated those letters and made her hatred of them known, and that I steered away from that voice-because of our relationship, because of an intense relationship with a woman. Which now seems to me emblematic: You could either play with the boys like that, and relegate women to minor and substantially objectified characters on the margin, or you could try and have a full-fledged relationship with a woman, in which case that kind of boy writing, however brilliant and masterful, was necessarily subordinate. It’s worth noting that at this point in my life, I feel much more indebted to various female writers- Alice Munro, Christina Stead, Flannery O’Connor, Jane Smiley, Paula Fox, to name a few - than I do to Pynchon.

